首页> 外文OA文献 >Privacy Shields for Whom? Key Actors and Privacy Discourses on Twitter and in Newspapers
【2h】

Privacy Shields for Whom? Key Actors and Privacy Discourses on Twitter and in Newspapers

机译:谁的隐私盾? Twitter和报纸上的主要演员和隐私话语

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The sharing of data across borders is core in informational economies. However, the Schrems case against Facebook in 2014 raised important questions about the capacity of existing ‘safe harbour’ policies and practices of multinational corporations in Europe and North America to protect the privacy of individuals’ data. The EU–US ‘Privacy Shield’ framework was subsequently developed to increase data privacy protections. This paper draws upon a sample of English language newspapers and Twitter accounts in Europe and the US from the summer of 2016 to identify the key actors and discourses surrounding the introduction of the Privacy Shield framework. The findings reveal a dominance of trade, market and security language, a focus on individual informational privacy and the dominance of state and legal actors. We argue that privacy is not being redefined in the context of intercontinental data transfers but rather narrowed to a neoliberal free trade framing of information privacy.
机译:跨境共享数据是信息经济中的核心。但是,2014年针对Facebook的Schrems案对欧洲和北美跨国公司现有的“安全港”政策和惯例保护个人数据隐私的能力提出了重要问题。随后开发了欧盟-美国的“隐私盾”框架,以增强数据隐私保护。本文以2016年夏季以来在欧洲和美国的英语报纸和Twitter帐户样本为样本,以确定围绕Privacy Shield框架引入的主要参与者和言论。调查结果揭示了贸易,市场和安全语言的主导地位,侧重于个人信息隐私以及国家和法律行为者的主导地位。我们认为,隐私并不是在洲际数据传输的背景下重新定义,而是局限于信息自由的新自由主义自由贸易框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号